Pages

Jump to bottom

2 comments

1 lawhawk  Dec 10, 2010 11:09:39am

The peace process failed because the process and its underlying assumptions was fatally flawed.

It starts with an assumption that both Israel and Palestinians want: (1) peace; (2) a 2-state solution; and (3) are willing to make concessions in furtherance of 1 and 2.

Hamas, which comprises one portion of the Palestinian electorate (and most significantly a portion of the Palestinian Authority that supposedly represents the Palestinians), rejects Israel’s existence and refuses a 2-state solution.

So, what is to be done about that? Well, the diplomatic solution - pseudorealism at its finest - is to ignore them entirely. Make it appear that Hamas doesn’t even relate to the process and hope that Israel and Fatah go along.

Israel has repeatedly shown a willingness to make concessions for peace and meets all the conditions set forth above.

The Palestinians can’t even get out of step 1. Hamas continues its state of war against Israel; Fatah engages in ongoing revisionist history and refuses to recognize Israel’s claims to the land.

It’s little wonder the process has collapsed. It is surprising that it took this long to realize what a mess it was and that starting a process and putting Presidential prestige on the line was a big mistake.

2 sliv_the_eli  Dec 10, 2010 4:33:45pm

re: #1 lawhawk
LH,
An astute analysis, as usual. I would add that the fundamental flaw with the approach of the past several U.S. administrations is that it has focused on the peace “process” and not on whether there is a realistic possiblity to achieve peace and, if there is, what substantive steps the parties must take to achieve it.

By overly focusing on “process” — or what I described a few days ago as the shape of the table — U.S. administrations have wasted precious moral authority trying to achieve talks for the sake of talks, even in the face of a vast amount of evidence that the Palestinians do not desire a true peace and that the Palestinian Authority — to say nothing of the rejectionist Hamas-Jihad Islami-Fatah front — has not only done nothing to educate its constituency for peace but, to the contrary, has continued its nefarious game of seeking to erase Jewish historical connections to the land.

Part of the problem also stems from the deep-rooted nature of the conflict, which does not lend itself to grandiose pronouncements that peace will be achieved in 12 or 24 months, and the short (by comparison) electoral cycles in the United States. The latter invariably leads U.S. Presidents to focus on process as a means of securing their re-election in a few years or, if they serve a second term, as a means of securing their “place in history”.

The recent Bush administration provides a useful case study. Whatever his faults, President Bush (GWB, not GHWB), probably had the right idea when he first took office and sought to scale back the degree of involvement by the White House. He appeared at the time to have recognized that high-level personal involvement by the White House in a situation in which no near term resolution is feasible — for the reasons you mentioned — can only degrade the moral authority of the White House if the day comes when the President’s direct involvement can actually help the two sides bridge the last gaps to an agreement. (For a good example of this problem, one need only look at the fact that many Palestinian Arabs blame the U.S. for not securing an Israeli extension of the building moratorium). Unfortunately, President Bush was excoriated by the Western media for this benign neglect, and eventually (for that and other reasons, such as 9/11 and the desire to secure his own place in history) fell into the trap of putting the prestige of his Office on the line without any evidence that the Palestinians had moved any closer to a desire for real peace and for the compromises that “we all know” are necessary for an agreement to be reached.

As Professor Rubin points out in his blog post, it remains to be seen which way the current President will go. Based upon his prior actions and the electoral concerns noted above, I am not confident that he will avoid repeating the mistakes of his recent predecessors. On the other hand, in the spirit of the season, we can at least remain hopeful.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
The Pandemic Cost 7 Million Lives, but Talks to Prevent a Repeat Stall In late 2021, as the world reeled from the arrival of the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus, representatives of almost 200 countries met - some online, some in-person in Geneva - hoping to forestall a future worldwide ...
Cheechako
5 days ago
Views: 156 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
2 weeks ago
Views: 321 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1